Néstor Kirchner And The Politics Of Fear
Former Argentine President this week has twice appealed to Argentines’ worst fears by saing that if they don’t vote for the ruling Frente Para La Victoria Party in June’s congressional election the country will “explode.”
In a firey campaign speech Tuesday night, Kirchner put it this way:
“If on June 28 Cristina doesn’t have a legislative majority, we’ll return to that country of 2001. We’ll return to unemployment. We’ll return to indigence. We’ll return to poverty and we’ll return to that Argentina that explodes,” Kirchner said, demonstrating that his appeal is to the lowest common denominator and not to the highest hopes and aspirations of average Argentines.
Kirchner’s approach to politics is the antithesis of that practiced by one of his wife’s favorite politicians, U.S. President Barack Obama. Obama always appealed to his constituents’ highest hopes. He sought to lift his voters to a new plane, calling on them not to be better than each other but to be better than themselves.
“I’m asking you to believe. Not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington … I’m asking you to believe in yours,” Obama said.
Contrast that appeal to an elevated, hopeful, can-do – “Yes we can” – mentality to Kirchner’s appeal to peoples’ worst fears. The appeal, I would imagine to many voters, is entirely unappealing. It smacks of desperation, analysts say, but to others it is simply an accurate description of reality.
“How could we have advanced all these years without a majority in Congress,” Kirchner’s wife, President Cristina Fernandez, asked rhetorically in a speech Wednesday. Fernandez criticized the media for portraying her husband’s comments as anything less than a brave statement of the truth.
“So why do people get angry when the ex president describes this situation? Those who want to be in the majority were in the government in 2001. These are the people that cut retirees’ pension benefits by 13%, who voted to change a labor law in which bribes were involved. These are the same people. When the ex president refers to governability, he’s not using a rhetorical trick. It’s just a description of reality.”
But Kirchner’s former cabinet chief and longtime political ally, Alberto Fernandez, was highly critical of his former boss. “If by losing an election we return to 2001, then everything we have done (since the Kirchners came to power) has been a failure,” he said.
Popularity: 1% [?]
It looks like he sniffs a defeat and is fighting back the only way he can. 2 months to go and you can get a hint that this election will get nasty.
my assessment
To me, he hates his wife, in a tacit way he called her incompetent.
If they do not winn they have no strategies, no material no talent to a dialog, no contingency plans, consens, change of ideas, zilch, nada.
It should go “my way” and when Im talking you are a dog, keep your mouth shut policy. He probably lost his image, and did not care about her image.
He’s the one and only abusing her publicly….if I where her, Iwould had smached my fry pan on his head….BUT and here is the straberry to put on the cake.
She missed the whole point because of her rigid brain disk there is no room for thinking, she just agreed with him
Therefore she is giving him all the rights to acknowledge that she is incompetent and unable to continue if the other guys winn.
Even Alberto felt that a big amount of wrong words are spred already doing more armn than good.
Nestor needs to go to a psych ward yesterday and have a soup of mechanical restrains
another fear.Swine flu,
dengue….
after much reading I found an old drink.
Tha says protec the inmune system, tastes good, as no alcohol and keep you away of the virus.
HESPERIDINA de Bagley, more than 100 years old stuff
have a good one
Hate this guy…
Well, the comparison with Obama maybe nice, but not useful and a little deceiving. Hope is frequently the theme of opposition campaigns, and fear the theme of the governing party’s campaigns (which is also true for McCain’s campaign in the last few weeks before the election). So, while you can say it’s a matter of style, it is also (and mostly) a matter of position (I don’t think that the next Obama campaign, after governing four years, will be able to rely that much on hope. He most likely will remind voters of how bad things were when republicans ran the country).
Hey Dani,
Interesting points. While I don’t agree fully with that you’re saying, there’s some validity to your points. It’s always harder for the incumbent to be the “hope for better” candidate. Even so, what your points miss is the fact that the Kirchners have always campaigned and governed based largely on negative rhetoric and the destruction of any opposition or opposing views. If you disagree with them, you’re a coupmonger, in their view. That’s the politics of fear.
Cheers,
Taos